Season 19 mid rates

[Chris-Wild]

Cutoff in Nhl is January 15th up to and including...then all teams will have played 41 games.

Also if anyone is interested in helping or has interest in learning, let me know.

[Ben-Sens]

i'd love to learn

[anthgrt-la]

I'd gladly try and help out where and when I can. Leaving tomorrow for Prague from Germany. Should have some spare time before the 15th though.

[Chris-Wild]

Nick volunteered but if i need any help i will ask, thanks.

[Chris-Wild]

These are draft, still checking for errors, if you notice something let me know.

DHL Ratings S19-DRAFT.xls

(285 KiB) Downloaded 277 times

Couple notes:

#1. Goalies who did not play 15 or more games use Season 18 ratings...for rookies i used the same caps we used in Season 17 (1-5 GP capped @ 65, 6-10 GP capped @ 75, 10-15 capped @ 85.

#2. SP/SK/DF was all carried over from Season 18.

#3. EN...for some reason this formula has been lost, i tried using other seasons formulas but could not figure it out so i carried last seasons EN over (skaters only, goalies were OK)...for rookies used a basic formula based on TOI/GP.

[Ted Riot]

just curious .. how the ratings is splitted between this and last season, should have been 50%-50%?

for example scoring SC

nikolai kulemin 2013-2014 9 goals, 2014 -15 9 goals .. total 18goals and his new SC rating is 62

matt read season 2013-14 22goals, 2014-15 3 goals .. total 25 goals and his new SC rating is 61

[Chris-Wild]

just curious .. how the ratings is splitted between this and last season, should have been 50%-50%?

for example scoring SC

nikolai kulemin 2013-2014 9 goals, 2014 -15 9 goals .. total 18goals and his new SC rating is 62

matt read season 2013-14 22goals, 2014-15 3 goals .. total 25 goals and his new SC rating is 61

Mid rates are 50/50 as per rules unless the player is a rookie or did not play in 20 or more games...in the case of both your players:

Kulemin old SC was 60, new is 64 so 50/50 is 62

Read old SC was 72, new is 50 so 50/50 is 61

...sorry about your luck on Matt Read

[Ted Riot]

Even worse than berglund.. Hah

In NHL Read scored 25g last and this season, berglund scored 20.

Read SC61, Berglund SC63.

Where is the problem?

[Chris-Wild]

Even worse than berglund.. Hah

In NHL Read scored 25g last and this season, berglund scored 20.

Read SC61, Berglund SC63.

Where is the problem?

Problem is your inability to comprehend math

[Chris-Wild]

Matt Read has 3 measly goals in 46 games...you should be ecstatic his SC isn't what it will be next season...50

[Ted Riot]

Berglund 20g in 122gms
Read 25g in 121gms

Read SC61 and Bergie SC63. So how can we say SC ratings are based on NHL stats? If ratings are based on last season stats and this season stats. Should the Formula first combine total goals then calculate SC

[Nick - Philly]

Berglund 20g in 122gms
Read 25g in 121gms

Read SC61 and Bergie SC63. So how can we say SC ratings are based on NHL stats? If ratings are based on last season stats and this season stats. Should the Formula first combine total goals then calculate SC

That's not how the formula works tough. It calculates SC based on points per game the first half of this season and then takes the average this season + the old ratings from the last full season.

He had 72 SC last season. Based on his 3 goals this season he would have 50 SC. The average of the two is 61. That is how we can say it is based on NHL stats. That is how they are based on both last season and this season's NHL stats. The formula takes the average rating after the rating is calculated. It doesn't take the per game stats over 123 games.

[jonquixote]

Berglund 20g in 122gms
Read 25g in 121gms

Read SC61 and Bergie SC63. So how can we say SC ratings are based on NHL stats? If ratings are based on last season stats and this season stats. Should the Formula first combine total goals then calculate SC

That's not how the formula works tough. It calculates SC based on points per game the first half of this season and then takes the average this season + the old ratings from the last full season.

He had 72 SC last season. Based on his 3 goals this season he would have 50 SC. The average of the two is 61. That is how we can say it is based on NHL stats. That is how they are based on both last season and this season's NHL stats. The formula takes the average rating after the rating is calculated. It doesn't take the per game stats over 123 games.

It's okay. Pasi has only been here for 18 seasons. These things take time to grasp.

[Chris-Wild]

Berglund 20g in 122gms
Read 25g in 121gms

Read SC61 and Bergie SC63. So how can we say SC ratings are based on NHL stats? If ratings are based on last season stats and this season stats. Should the Formula first combine total goals then calculate SC

[Ted Riot]

Always said DHL ratings sucks but i can live with it

Good work chris putting up rerates